Every team runs on a stack of web apps — CRMs, billing portals, internal admin tools, helpdesks. And every day, quietly, those tools fail the people using them. A button that doesn't respond. A form that resets. A page that takes nine seconds to load. An error that no one ever reports because there's a workaround, and the workaround becomes the job.
None of that shows up in a dashboard. It just shows up as a vague sense that things take longer than they should — and as employees who look "less productive" when the truth is they're fighting their tools.
We built Hindsight because the usual response to that problem is backwards. The market is full of software that watches people — counting keystrokes, scoring activity, treating employees as the thing to be optimized. That's the wrong target. The problem was never the person. It's the broken screen, the slow system, the workflow that takes eleven steps to do a two-step job.
We measure how the tools and workflows perform for people — where they're slow, where they fail. The goal is to fix the experience, never to score the individual.
"I think the CRM is slow" becomes "the account page takes 8 seconds and cost 40 hours last month." Decisions about what to fix, automate, or retrain should run on proof.
People see a clear notice, sensitive data is redacted, and access is governed and audited. Trust isn't a feature we bolted on — it's the only way this is worth building.
Hindsight captures how work actually happens in the browser, automatically detects the moments of friction — the rage clicks, dead ends, errors, and slow tools — and reconstructs the workflows so teams can see exactly where work gets stuck. Product and Ops teams use it to fix broken processes and know where people need support. IT and Support teams use it to see what really broke and resolve it faster.
The name is the idea: with hindsight, the thing that went wrong is obvious. We just make it obvious sooner — and pointed at the tools, where the fix actually lives.